The Reports results include the pipeline used, date created, when the report started, and when the reported completed. The output is separated into 6 sections:

1. Summary
2. Dashboard
3. Multi Variable
4. Explorer
5. Charts
6. Downloads

This information provides a complete audit trail and transparency into the model, allowing users to understand how results are generated and directly tie insights back to campaign performance, rather than relying on a black-box approach.

Summary

The Summary section provides a high-level overview of the analysis, including the Report ID, Advertiser ID, and Date Range, along with an automatically generated Executive Summary that explains what is driving performance and helps inform optimization decisions using model-based predictions.

Tip: You can input the Executive Summary into your preferred LLM (e.g., ChatGPT or Claude) to quickly generate a presentation deck or case study based on the results.

Dashboard

The Dashboard section provides a visual overview of campaign performance. It shows which features drive conversions, geographic performance with drill-down maps, temporal patterns, CPA predictions, and the model’s top and bottom performers across all dimensions.

Dashboard Sections:

• Tile Metrics
• What Drives Conversions – Feature Importance (SHAP)
• Feature Impact Distribution
• Geographic Performance – Click a State to See ZIP Codes
• Geo Zip – Best vs Worst Performers
• Device Type – Best vs Worst Performers
• Content Genre – Best vs Worst Performers
• Conversion Rate by Day of Week
• Conversion Rate by Hour
• Time to Conversion
• Impression Frequency & Conversion Rate
• Cumulative eCPA Over Time
• Cost Efficiency by Feature
  • Content Genre
  • Content Livestream
  • Day
  • Device Type
  • Geo Region
  • Geo Zip
  • Hour

Tile Metrics

• Total Impressions: Total Ad impressions served across all geographies.
• Unique Users: Unique IP addresses reached.
  • Note that IP does not equal a person. Shared IPs (Households, offices, etc.) mean actual reach may differ.
• Attributed Impressions: Impressions that were part of a conversion path. Multiple impressions can contribute to the same conversion.
• Total Spend: Total media cost for the reports date range.
• ECPM: Effective cost per thousand impressions.

What Drives Conversions – Feature Importance (SHAP)

At a high level, this section shows which factors matter most, which helps you quickly focus on the biggest drivers of performance. If certain features are not shown, it means they were not included in the report and did not have a statistically meaningful impact on the model.

Chart View

This view ranks the factors that have the greatest impact on conversions based on the model’s analysis. It uses SHAP (Shapley values) to quantify how much each feature contributes to performance.

In the above example, features such as Geo Zip, Device Type, Content Genre, Day, Geo Region, Hour, and Content Livestream are ranked by their impact on conversions, where higher values indicate a stronger influence on outcomes. Hover over the bar chart to see the features mean absolute SHAP value.

Example insight from the above model:

• Geo Zip is the strongest driver
• Followed by App Bundle, then Publisher Name, and Geo Region

Table View

Provides detailed statistics for each feature:

• Mean Abs SHAP: Overall importance (primary ranking metric)
• Mean SHAP: Direction of impact (positive or negative influence)
• STD SHAP: Variability across observations
• Max / Min SHAP: Range of impact
• Confidence Intervals (CI Lower / Upper): Stability and reliability of the importance score

Users can download this table as a CSV file for further analysis.

Feature Impact Distribution

At a high level, this section shows how each feature influences conversions directionally across all predictions, not just how important it is.

Chart View

Each violin represents the distribution of SHAP values for a feature:

• Wide Spread: more predictions fall at that impact level
• Right of zero: pushes toward conversion
• Left of zero: pushes away from conversion

The box inside each violin shows:

• Median: Center line
• Quartiles: Interquartile range of typical values

How to Interpret:

• Wide spread: Feature impact varies significantly across observations
• Centered Near Zero: Limited average influence on predictions
• Skewed Right: Generally contributes positively to conversion
• Skewed Left: Generally contributes negatively to conversion

Example insights from the above model:

• Geo Zip has the widest spread, ranging roughly from -3 to +3, with density on both sides of zero.
  • This means geography can both strongly increase and decrease conversion likelihood depending on the ZIP—it’s highly impactful but varies significantly across users.
• Device Type is mostly concentrated between -0.5 and +1.5, with more density on the positive side.
  • This indicates device generally has a positive influence on conversions, but with moderate variability.
• Content Genre is tightly clustered around 0 to +0.5, slightly right-skewed.
  • This suggests a consistent but smaller positive effect on conversion likelihood.
• Day is centered very close to zero with a narrow spread (roughly -0.3 to +0.3).
  • This indicates limited overall impact, with only minor variation by day.

These insights reflect how the model predicts conversion likelihood and help explain what is driving those predictions. The resulting prediction scores are then used to inform bidding decisions, where impressions above or below defined thresholds influence whether the system chooses to bid in real time.

Table View

This table contains the same data as the What Drives Conversions — Feature Importance (SHAP) section and is available for download for further analysis.

Geographic Performance – Click a State to See ZIP Codes

This section provides an interactive map view of campaign performance by geography, allowing you to quickly identify high- and low-performing regions.

What It Shows:

• Performance by State, with the ability to drill down into ZIP code level data
• Toggle between key metric views:
  • Conversion Rate
  • Conversions
  • Impressions
• Toggle between Heatmap and Boundaries view
  • Boundaries: Clearly outlines geographic regions
  • Heatmap: Highlights performance intensity across regions

Boundaries View

Heatmap View

Interactions:

• Hover over a state to view:
  • State Name
  • Conversion Rate
  • Impressions
  • Attributed Impressions
  • Unique Conversions
  • Unique Users
  • Predicted Rate
• Click a state to drill down into ZIP level performance – Zip code view:
  • Zip code
  • Zip code name
  • Conversions
  • Impressions
  • Attributed Impressions
  • Unique Conversions
  • Unique Users
  • Predicted Rate

Zip Code View

Metric Views

The map can be toggled between three key performance views:

• Conversion Rate: Shows efficiency by geography (conversions ÷ impressions).
  • Best for identifying high-performing, efficient areas to scale.
• Conversions: Shows total conversion volume by geography. Use Conversions to validate impact and volume.
  • Best for understanding where results are coming from at scale.
• Impressions: Shows delivery volume by geography.
  • Best for identifying where ads are being served and any gaps in delivery.

Table View

This table contains the underlying data used to power the Geographic Performance map, providing detailed metrics at the ZIP code level.

Each row represents a ZIP code and its associated performance, which is aggregated to render state-level views in the map.

What It Includes:

• Geographic identifiers
  • Geo Zip
  • Geo Region Name
  • City
  • State ID
• Delivery Metrics
  • Impressions: Total number of times ads were served
  • Attributed Impressions: Impressions tied to users who later converted within the lookback window
  • Unique Users: Number of distinct users exposed to ads
• Performance Metrics
  • Conversions: Total number of conversion events attributed to the campaign
  • Conversion Rate: Attributed Impressions / Impressions
  • Attributed Conversion Rate: Conversions / Impressions
• Model-derived Metrics
  • Conversion Rate Z-Score: Predicted / Normalized performance
  • Anomaly Flag: Identifies outliers (0 = normal, 1 = anomaly)

Example insight:

• 80513 (CO) shows a high Conversion Rate (17.53%) and Attributed Conversion Rate of 0.53% with a strong z-score (~7.9), indicating performance well above average.

Best vs Worst Performers

This section highlights the highest and lowest performing values for a given dimension based on the model’s predictions and observed conversion rates.

Features include:

• Geo Zip
• Device Type
• Content Genre

At a high level, it shows which values are driving strong positive or negative performance, along with how consistently they perform.

Chart View

Geo Zip Example:

• Displays the distribution of SHAP values for top and bottom performing ZIP codes
• Green violins = top performers (high predicted contribution to conversions)
• Red violins = bottom performers (negative impact on conversion likelihood)

How to Read:

• Above Zero (Green): Increases likelihood of conversion.
• Below Zero (Red): Decreases likelihood of conversion.
• Narrow Shape: Consistent performance across users.
• Wide Shape: Variable performance across users.
• Box Plot (inside the violin) – Shows the median (center line) and quartiles (typical range of values)

Table View

Provides detailed metrics for each feature:

• Value: Feature dependent examples
  • Geo Zip: 85029 – Phoenix, AZ
  • Device Type: 3 – Connected TV (CTV)
  • Content Genre: food & cookiing
• Rank: Top or Bottom performer
• Conversion Rate : Observed conversion rate
• Mean SHAP: Average contribution to model predictions
• Samples: Number of observations (data volume)

Example Insight

• 64128 (Kansas City, MO) shows a strong conversion rate (87.50%) with a high positive mean SHAP (~1.67) and a solid sample size (96), indicating a reliable, high-performing market with both scale and consistency

Conversion Rate by Day of Week

This section breaks down conversion rate by the day the ad was served, helping identify which days drive the strongest performance and can be used as a day parting optimization. These insights can be applied manually within the platform. If the model is applied to the campaign or line, day-of-week performance is automatically incorporated into real-time bidding decisions.

What It Shows:

• Conversion rate for each day of the week
• Performance trends across Monday–Sunday
• Relative differences in efficiency by day

How to Use:

• Identify high-performing days to increase spend or prioritize delivery
• Identify underperforming days to reduce spend or adjust bidding
• Inform dayparting strategies to improve overall efficiency

Conversion Rate by Hour

This section breaks down conversion rate by the hour the ad was served (0–23), helping identify peak performance windows throughout the day. These insights can be applied manually within the platform. If the model is applied to the campaign or line, day-of-week performance is automatically incorporated into real-time bidding decisions.

What It Shows:

• Conversion rate for each hour of the day (0–23)
• Performance trends across morning, afternoon, evening, and overnight
• Relative differences in efficiency by hour

How to Use:

• Identify peak hours to increase bids or prioritize delivery
• Identify low-performing hours to reduce spend or adjust bidding
• Inform hour-of-day bid adjustments to improve efficiency

Time to Conversion

This section shows the distribution of time between when an ad was served and when a user converted, helping you understand how long the typical conversion path takes. Short times suggest direct response; long times suggest consideration-based purchase behavior.

Chart View

What It Shows:

• Time between impression to conversion, grouped into time buckets:
  • <1 hr
  • 1–6 hrs
  • 6-24 hrs
  • 1–3 days
  • 3-7 days
  • 7-14 days
  • 14+ days
• Volume of conversions occurring within each time window (hover to see the value).
• Overall shape of the conversion lag distribution

Interpretation:

• Short time to conversion indicates more direct response behavior
• Longer time to conversion indicates more consideration-based or delayed decision-making
• Peaks in specific time ranges highlight when users are most likely to convert after exposure

Table View

Example Insights:

• Conversions are highest within the first few hours (0–3 hrs), indicating strong immediate response behavior
• There is a secondary concentration in the 1–7 day range, suggesting some users convert after additional consideration
• Very long conversion windows (14+ days) show lower volume, indicating diminishing impact over time

This distribution helps inform lookback window selection, attribution settings, and frequency strategy.

• If conversions happen quickly (short lag), higher frequency over a shorter window can be effective.
• If conversions take longer (delayed lag), sustained frequency over time is needed to stay top of mind.
• Helps avoid overexposing users too early or underexposing during longer consideration periods.

Impression Frequency & Conversion Rate

This section shows how conversion rate changes as users are exposed to more impressions, helping identify the optimal frequency for performance. Higher-frequency users typically had more time in the campaign, so results reflect correlation, not causation. Frequency should be interpreted alongside time-to-conversion and campaign duration.

Chart View

What It Shows:

• Bars: Conversion rate at each impression frequency
• Line: Total users reached at each frequency level
• Green arrow annotation: Peak marginal return, the point where each additional impression drives the most incremental lift

How to Interpret:

• Rising conversion rate: additional impressions are improving performance
• Peak point (green marker): optimal frequency where incremental lift is highest
• After peak: diminishing returns, where additional impressions add less value
• User curve (line) : shows how many users are exposed at each frequency level

Table View

Provides detailed performance metrics at each impression frequency level:

• Frequency Bucket: Number of impressions served per user
• Total Users: Number of users reached at that frequency
• Converting Users: Number of users who converted at that frequency
• Conversion Rate: Conversion rate at that frequency level

Interpretation:

• Find the optimal frequency
  • Identify the point where conversion rate is highest before diminishing returns.
• Avoid overexposure
  • If performance drops at higher frequencies, you’re wasting impressions.
• Balance scale vs efficiency
  • Higher frequency may increase conversion rate but reach fewer users.
• Inform frequency caps and bidding strategy
  • Helps determine how often to show ads per user

Additional Notes:

• Higher frequency users often had more time in the campaign, so results are correlated, not causal
• Should be used alongside:
  • User volume (Total Users)
  • Time to conversion

Cumulative eCPA Over Time

This section shows how spend and conversions accumulate over time, providing a complete view of attribution across the campaign and its lookback window.

Chart View

What It Shows:

• Blue line: Cumulative eCPA (efficiency over time)
• Green dotted line: Cumulative spend
• Blue dotted line: Cumulative conversions
• Shaded region: Actual study period (active campaign dates)

Interpretation:

• Spend begins accumulating before the study period due to the lookback window
• onversions continue after impressions are served, as users convert over time
• Early in the timeline, eCPA may appear inflated or volatile because not all conversions have occurred yet
• As time progresses, the lookback “tail” fills in, and eCPA stabilizes

Table View

Provides a daily breakdown of spend, conversions, and efficiency metrics used to build the cumulative chart.

Columns:

• Imp Date: Date impressions were served
• Impressions: Total impressions delivered on that date
• Unique Users: Number of distinct users reached
• Total Cost: Spend for that day
• Unique Conversions by Imp Date: Conversions attributed back to the date the impression occurred
• Unique Conversions by Conv Date: Conversions counted on the date the conversion actually happened
• Conversion Rate: Conversions relative to impressions for that day
• eCPA: Cost per conversion for that day
• eCPM: Cost per thousand impressions
• Cumulative Spend: Running total of spend over time
• Cumulative Conversions by Imp Date: Running total of conversions attributed back to impression dates
• Cumulative Conversions by Conv Date: Running total of conversions based on when conversions actually occurred
• Cumulative eCPA: Running cost per conversion over time, calculated from cumulative spend and cumulative conversions

Cost Efficiency by Feature

This section compares cost and performance metrics across values of a selected feature, helping identify the most efficient segments to prioritize.

Select from the following features:

• App Bundle
• Content Genre
• Content Series
• Day
• Device Type
• Geo Region
• Geo Zip
• Hour
• Publisher Name
• Site Domain

Content Genre Example

eCPA ($): Cost per acquisition

• Shows cost per acquisition by feature value
• Bars are sorted from lowest to highest eCPA
• Color intensity reflects efficiency (darker = higher cost / less efficient)

Interpretation:

• Look for shorter bars and lighter color. These are the most efficient segments.
• These represent lowest cost per conversion (best ROI).
• This is the primary view for optimization decisions

eCPM ($): Cost per thousand impressions

• Shows cost per thousand impressions by feature value
• Bars are sorted from highest to lowest cost
• Color intensity reflects relative cost (darker = more expensive)

Interpretation:

• Look for shorter bars and lighter color. This is lower-cost inventory.
• Use this to understand where you’re paying more or less to reach users.
• Low cost doesn’t always mean good performance.

Conversion Rate: Efficiency of converting impressions

• Shows conversion rate by feature value
• Bars are sorted from highest to lowest conversion rate
• Color reflects relative performance (darker = lower performance)

Interpretation:

• Look for taller bars and lighter color. These are higher-performing segments.
• These indicate where users are most likely to convert
• Use this to identify strong audiences or content

Multi Variable

This section explores how multiple features interact together to influence conversion performance, rather than looking at each feature in isolation.

It helps uncover combinations of variables (e.g., Geo + Device + Content) that drive stronger or weaker outcomes.

Subsections:

• Waterfalls
• High Single Variables
• Low Single Variables
• High 2-Way
• Low 2-Way
• High 3-Way
• Low 3-Way

Waterfalls

This view explains how the model builds individual predictions. Each chart starts from a base rate and shows how each feature pushes the prediction up (green) or down (red) to reach the final score, making the model transparent rather than a black box.

High Confidence Example

Low Confidence Example

What It Shows:

• Each chart starts from a base conversion rate (baseline prediction) Individual features are then added step-by-step
• Each feature pushes the prediction up or down:
  • Green bars increase likelihood of conversion
  • Red bars decrease likelihood of conversion
• The final value represents the model’s predicted conversion score

Interpretation:

• Start at the base rate (average performance)
• Follow each step to see how features contribute to the final prediction
• Larger bars = stronger impact on the prediction
• The final value shows how likely that specific combination is to convert

High Single Variables

This section identifies individual feature values that appear significantly more often in top-converting predictions than in the overall population. High lift means strong positive signal for targeting.\

Chart View

What It Shows:

• Each point represents a single feature value (e.g., a specific ZIP, device type, or content genre)
• Compares:
  • Overall frequency (how often it appears in the dataset)
  • Top-converting frequency (how often it appears in high-performing predictions)
• Color indicates lift strength (darker = stronger signal)

Interpretation:

• Points above the baseline appear more often in top-performing outcomes
• Points further right are more common overall
• Points higher on the chart show stronger positive signal
• Darker color indicates higher lift and a stronger targeting signal

Table View

Provides detailed metrics for each high-performing single feature value identified by the model. Users can download the table as a CSV for further analysis.

Columns:

• Segment: Which classification it falls under
• Feature: The dimension being analyzed (e.g., Geo Zip, Device Type, Content Genre)
• Value: The specific value within that feature
• Segment Frequency: Share of this value within top-performing predictions
• Baseline Frequency: Share of this value across the overall dataset
• Lift: Ratio of Segment Frequency to Baseline Frequency showing how much more often this value appears in top-performing outcomes vs. normal.
• Segment Count: Number of occurrences of this value within top-performing predictions
• Unique IPs: Number of unique users associated with this value
• Score: Model-derived strength of the signal. The higher the value the stronger the posititive contribution to conversion likelihood.

Interpretation:

• High lift with high segment count indicates a strong and scalable opportunity
• High lift with low segment count indicates a niche but promising segment that should be tested before scaling
• Score reflects how impactful the value is within the model and helps prioritize which signals matter most

Low Single Variables

This section identifies individual feature values that appear significantly more often in low-converting predictions than in the overall population. Low lift indicates a negative signal and these segments may be deprioritized or excluded from targeting.

Chart View

What It Shows:

• Each point represents a single feature value (e.g., a specific ZIP, device type, or content genre)
• Compares:
  • Overall frequency (how often it appears in the dataset)
  • Low-converting frequency (how often it appears in low-performing predictions)
• Color indicates lift strength (darker = stronger negative signal)

Interpretation:

• Points above the baseline appear more often in low-performing outcomes
• Points further right are more common overall
• Points higher on the chart show stronger negative signal
• Darker color indicates lower lift and a stronger signal to avoid

Table View

Provides detailed metrics for each low-performing single feature value identified by the model. Users can download the table as a CSV for further analysis.

Columns:

• Segment: Which classification it falls under
• Feature: The dimension being analyzed (e.g., Geo Zip, Device Type, Content Genre)
• Value: The specific value within that feature
• Segment Frequency: Share of this value within top-performing predictions
• Baseline Frequency: Share of this value across the overall dataset
• Lift: Ratio of Segment Frequency to Baseline Frequency showing how much more often this value appears in top-performing outcomes vs. normal.
• Segment Count: Number of occurrences of this value within top-performing predictions
• Unique IPs: Number of unique users associated with this value
• Score: Model-derived strength of the signal. The higher the value the stronger the posititive contribution to conversion likelihood.

Interpretation:

• Low lift with high segment count indicates a consistently underperforming segment that may be worth reducing or excluding
• Low lift with low segment count indicates a weaker signal with limited impact
• Score reflects how negatively the value impacts performance and helps prioritize what to deprioritize

High 2-Way and High 3-Way

These sections identify combinations of feature values that together produce conversion rates above the campaign average.

• 2-Way: Combinations of two features (e.g., Geo Zip + Device)
• 3-Way: Combinations of three features (e.g., Geo Zip + Device + Day)

These represent layered signals, where performance improves when features are used together.

Chart View

What It Shows:

• Each point represents a combination of feature values (e.g., 35209 × 1)
• X-axis shows total count / volume (log scale)
• Y-axis shows conversion rate
• Color indicates lift vs campaign average (darker = stronger performance)

Interpretation:

• Points higher on the chart have higher conversion rate
• Points further right have more volume (more scalable)
• Top-right quadrant contains the best combinations (high performance + scale)
• Top-left quadrant contains high performance but low volume (niche opportunities)
• Bottom-right quadrant contains high volume but lower performance (less efficient)
• Color intensity shows stronger lift vs average (darker = better signal)

Example Insight:

• 35209 × 1 shows:
  • Very high conversion rate (~0.94)
  • Strong lift (~2.08x vs average)
  • Moderate volume (53 samples)
• This indicates a high-performing combination with meaningful scale, making it a strong candidate for targeting.

Table View

Provides detailed metrics for each high-performing combination. Users can download the table as a CSV for further analysis.

Columns:

• Feature 1: First dimension in the combination
• Feature 2: Second dimension (and Feature 3 for 3-way analysis)
• Combination: Combined feature values (e.g., 29220 × sc)
• Conversion Rate: Conversion rate for this specific combination
• Conversions: Total conversions generated
• Total Count: Number of observations for this combination
• Unique IPs: Number of unique users associated with this combination
• Lift vs Avg: Performance relative to campaign average
  (>1 = above average performance)
• Score: Model-derived strength of the signal
  (higher = stronger positive contribution to conversion likelihood)
• p-value: Statistical significance of the result
• p-adjusted: Adjusted p-value accounting for multiple comparisons
• Significant: Indicates whether the result is statistically significant (TRUE/FALSE)

Interpretation:

• High lift with high total count indicates a strong and scalable combination
• High lift with low count indicates a promising but niche combination
• Statistically significant results provide higher confidence in the signal
• Score helps prioritize which combinations have the strongest impact

Low 2-Way and Low 3-Way

These sections identify combinations of feature values that together produce conversion rates below the campaign average.

• 2-Way = combinations of two features
• 3-Way = combinations of three features

These represent negative interaction signals, where performance declines when features are combined.

Chart View

What It Shows:

• Each point represents a combination of feature values
• X-axis shows total count / volume (log scale)
• Y-axis shows conversion rate
• Color indicates lift vs campaign average (darker blue = more negative performance)

Interpretation:

• Points higher on the chart have higher conversion rate
• Points further right have more volume (more scalable)
• Bottom-right quadrant contains the worst combinations (low performance + high volume)
• Bottom-left quadrant contains low performance but low volume (limited impact)
• Top-right quadrant contains higher volume with moderate performance (mixed efficiency)
• Top-left quadrant contains stronger performance but low volume (niche and less impactful)
• Color intensity shows stronger negative lift vs average (darker = worse signal)

Table View

Provides detailed metrics for each low-performing combination of feature values. Users can download the table as a CSV for further analysis.

Columns:

• Feature 1: First dimension in the combination
• Feature 2: Second dimension (and Feature 3 for 3-way analysis)
• Combination: Combined feature values
• Conversion Rate: Conversion rate for this combination
• Conversions: Total conversions generated
• Total Count: Number of observations for this combination
• Unique IPs: Number of unique users associated with this combination
• Lift vs Avg: Performance relative to campaign average
  (<1 = below average performance)
• Score: Model-derived strength of the signal
  (lower = stronger negative impact on conversion likelihood)
• p-value: Statistical significance of the result
• p-adjusted: Adjusted p-value accounting for multiple comparisons
• Significant: Indicates whether the result is statistically significant (TRUE/FALSE)

Interpretation:

• Low lift with high total count indicates a consistently underperforming combination that should be reduced or excluded
• Low lift with low total count indicates a weaker signal with limited impact
• Statistically significant results provide higher confidence in deprioritization decisions
• Score reflects how strongly the combination negatively impacts performance and helps prioritize what to avoid

Explorer

The Explorer tab allows you to browse and interact with all available datasets used in the model. Select a dataset to view its chart and table. Use the metric buttons above charts to switch between available metrics.

What It Does:

• Lists all datasets in the left-hand panel
• Displays each selection as a chart and table
• Allows switching between multiple metrics:
  • SHAP Value
  • Count
  • Conversions
  • Conversion Rate

This section is intentionally extensive and exploratory. Users are encouraged to navigate different datasets and metrics to uncover additional insights.

Charts

The Charts tab provides access to all visualizations generated by the model, organized into categories for easier navigation and analysis.

Charts are grouped into the following sections:

• Categorical Features: Visual breakdowns of performance across individual feature dimensions
• Waterfall Analysis: Shows how the model builds predictions step-by-step
• SHAP Summary: Provides a comprehensive view of feature importance and impact across the model using multiple visualization types:
  • Heatmap: Shows how feature values impact predictions across observations
  • Decision Plot: Visualizes how features combine step-by-step to form predictions
  • Beeswarm Plot: Displays the distribution and direction of feature impact across all data
  • Bar Chart: Ranks features by overall importance
• Feature Violin: Distribution of feature impact across all predictions

Downloads

The Downloads section provides full access to all model outputs, enabling deeper analysis, reporting, and sharing across teams. These outputs can be used for investigation and validation, but more importantly, the model can be applied directly to campaigns or line items, allowing insights to seamlessly translate into real-time bidding and optimization.

Available Downloads (JSON & CSV):

• Executive Summary: High-level summary of findings, insights, and key drivers
• High Confidence Single Variables: Top-performing individual feature values with strong positive signals
• Low Confidence Single Variables: Underperforming individual feature values to deprioritize
• High Performing 2-Way Combinations: Top-performing pairs of feature values
• Low Performing 2-Way Combinations: Underperforming pairs of feature values
• High Performing 3-Way Combinations: Top-performing combinations of three features
• Low Performing 3-Way Combinations: Underperforming combinations of three features
• CPA Predictions by Segment: Model-predicted cost efficiency across segments
• All Combined: Complete dataset including all outputs in a single export